Important EPF Changes Effective November 2025: What Employees Should Know

On October 15, 2025, the Ministry of Labour and Employment released an official statement via the Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), outlining the latest reforms to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) and Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS).
These updates, approved by the Central Board of Trustees (CBT), are designed to streamline withdrawal procedures, expand digital accessibility, and speed up claim processing, while continuing to protect employees’ retirement funds.
The announcement also aimed to clarify misconceptions spreading on social media and to inform both employers and employees about the real implications of these policy changes.


🔹 Major Highlights from the EPFO Press Release

a) Streamlined EPF Withdrawal System
Previously, EPF members had to follow separate rules for different partial withdrawal purposes such as marriage, medical needs, education, or home purchase.
The new unified withdrawal framework brings all these under one simplified set of rules. It now:

  • Permits withdrawals from both employee and employer contributions (including interest).

  • Reduces the minimum service period to just 12 months, compared to 5–7 years earlier.

  • Introduces uniform eligibility criteria across all withdrawal categories.

This integrated model eliminates the confusion caused by multiple provisions and makes the withdrawal process easier to understand and apply.


b) Access to Employer’s Contribution Made Easier
A major policy update now allows members to withdraw from the employer’s share as well, under certain approved conditions.
Eligible individuals can withdraw up to 75% of their total accumulated balance for needs such as housing, medical treatment, or during periods of unemployment.

This change provides greater financial flexibility for employees, especially in emergency situations, while still keeping a portion of funds reserved for post-retirement security.


c) Safeguards to Protect Retirement Corpus
Even with relaxed withdrawal norms, EPFO has introduced safeguards to preserve long-term savings.
Under the Employees’ Pension Scheme (EPS), the waiting period for final settlement has been increased from 2 months to 36 months after an employee leaves service.

This aims to discourage premature full withdrawals and promote a more sustainable retirement corpus.


d) Faster Claims & Digital-First Processing
EPFO’s new reforms also prioritize efficiency and technology adoption. Key enhancements include:

  • Increasing the auto-settlement limit for advance claims from ₹1 lakh to ₹5 lakh.

  • Streamlining claim verification with fewer documents.

  • Enabling UAN and Aadhaar-based digital processing for most claims and transfers.

  • Reducing reliance on employer verification, allowing direct claim handling via the EPFO portal.

Together, these initiatives aim to make EPF services faster, more transparent, and user-friendly.


e) Clarification on Social Media Rumors
The October 2025 EPFO press release also addressed misinformation circulating online about complete EPF withdrawals.
It clarified that:

  • There is no general permission for full withdrawal of EPF while still employed.

  • 100% withdrawal is only allowed upon retirement or under specific eligible cases.

  • Members should only rely on official EPFO and Ministry notifications for authentic updates.

This clarification was issued to prevent confusion and ensure members understand the genuine scope of the new rules.


🔹  Practical Guidance & Implementation Checklist

For Employees / EPF Members

  • Ensure that you have completed a minimum of 12 months of continuous employment before submitting a withdrawal request.

  • Under the revised framework, both the employee and employer shares of the fund can be withdrawn, provided the conditions are met.

  • Retain a sufficient balance in your EPF account to continue earning interest and to strengthen your long-term savings.

  • Members covered under EPS-95 should note that final pension withdrawal can only be initiated after 36 months from the date of leaving service.

  • Use your UAN-linked Aadhaar credentials for faster and smoother online claim submission and tracking.


For Employers / Establishments

  • Make sure that ECR filings and monthly contributions are submitted promptly to avoid delays in employee claim processing.

  • Communicate with employees about the revised withdrawal norms and associated limitations.

  • Keep all employee details updated and verified on the EPFO portal, including KYC, Aadhaar, PAN, and bank information.

  • Since employer contributions are now partially withdrawable, reconcile monthly contributions carefully to ensure accuracy in employee balances.


 

November 2025 Compliance Calendar: All GST, Income Tax & MCA Due Dates Explained

November 2025 brings a packed compliance schedule for businesses and professionals alike.
This month combines several overlapping deadlines — from GST returns and Income Tax audits to annual filings under the MCA.
To ease the pressure on taxpayers and corporates, authorities have granted notable extensions and relaxations, particularly concerning audit-related filings and MCA compliances.


🔹 1. MCA / ROC Compliances (As per Latest Relaxation)

Revised Filing Deadlines
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has granted an extension for submitting AOC-4, AOC-4 XBRL, AOC-4 CFS, AOC-4 NBFC (Ind AS), and MGT-7 / MGT-7A forms for FY 2024–25.
Companies can now file these forms till 31 December 2025 without incurring any additional filing fees.
This move is intended to facilitate a smoother transition to the new MCA V3 e-form system and reduce last-minute filing congestion on the portal.

⚠️ Note:
This relaxation applies only to filing fees and does not extend the AGM due date. All companies must have conducted their AGM within the prescribed period (typically by 30 September 2025). The waiver covers late fees only, not the delay in AGM itself.

📋 Professional To-Do List

  • Submit all AOC and MGT forms by 31 December 2025 to utilize the relaxation.

  • Make sure AGM minutes, board resolutions, and financial statements are properly finalized and signed before uploading.

  • If the AGM was not held on time, guide your client to apply for condonation or file compounding as per law.


🔹2. Income Tax Due Date Extension — CBDT Circular No. 15/2025

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has provided much-needed relief to taxpayers by extending key Income Tax compliance deadlines for the Assessment Year 2025–26.
This move comes after several professional associations and High Court interventions highlighted difficulties caused by portal issues and increased audit-reporting requirements.

Revised Deadlines

Filing / Report Earlier Due Date Extended Due Date
Tax Audit Report (Form 3CA/3CB–3CD) 31 October 2025 10 November 2025
Income Tax Return (Audit Cases) 30 November 2025 10 December 2025

The CBDT has clarified that these extensions are intended to ease compliance pressure on businesses and professionals during the busy audit season.

⚙️ Key Action Points for Practitioners

  • Complete and upload Tax Audit Reports by 10 November 2025.

  • File Income Tax Returns for audit cases by 10 December 2025.

  • For Transfer Pricing cases, align Form 3CEB filing with the extended ITR deadline (expected 10 December 2025).

  • Reconcile all figures in AIS / TIS / Form 26AS before submission to avoid mismatch or notice generation.

These extensions give professionals some breathing room — but it’s crucial to plan filings early to avoid last-minute portal congestion.


🔹3.GST Compliance Deadlines for November 2025 (Covering October Transactions)

Th.e GST compliance calendar for November 2025 follows the regular filing cycle, covering returns related to October 2025. Businesses must ensure timely submission to avoid late fees and interest.

Form Purpose Due Date
GSTR-7 TDS under GST 10 November 2025
GSTR-8 TCS by E-commerce Operators 10 November 2025
GSTR-1 Details of Outward Supplies (Monthly Filers) 11 November 2025
GSTR-5 / GSTR-6 NRTP / ISD Returns 13 November 2025
GSTR-3B Monthly Summary Return & Tax Payment 20 November 2025
PMT-06 Monthly Payment for QRMP Taxpayers 25 November 2025

📋 Action Points for Professionals

  • Review and reconcile October invoices before filing GSTR-1.

  • Match Input Tax Credit (ITC) from GSTR-2B prior to submitting GSTR-3B.

  • Ensure QRMP taxpayers complete their PMT-06 payments by 25 November 2025.

  • Begin early reconciliation for FY 2024–25 annual filings — GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C are due by 31 December 2025.


 

Bombay High Court overturns AI-generated income tax notice, terms process unjust to taxpayer

The Bombay High Court noted that the Income Tax Department had relied on artificial intelligence (AI) to cite three fabricated judicial precedents and issued a tax notice involving ₹22 crore of alleged income. Upon review, the Court observed that no such rulings actually exist and questioned how the department obtained these so-called judicial references. The Bench remarked, “In today’s age of Artificial Intelligence, there is often a tendency to trust system-generated results. However, when exercising quasi-judicial powers, such AI-generated information should never be accepted blindly but must be properly verified before use — otherwise, errors like this are bound to occur.”

Ultimately, invoking its authority under Article 226 of the Constitution, the Bombay High Court quashed the notice, remanded the matter back to the assessing officer, and directed that a fresh notice be issued with clear and specific findings. The Court further instructed that the taxpayer must be given a fair and reasonable opportunity to present their case.

Chartered Accountant (Dr.) Suresh Surana told ET Wealth Online that in this case (Writ Petition (L) No. 24366 of 2025), the taxpayer had challenged an assessment order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B for AY 2023–24. The Assessing Officer (AO) had raised the taxpayer’s income from ₹3.09 crore to ₹27.91 crore, issuing a consequent tax demand under Section 156 and a penalty notice under Section 274 read with Section 271AAC.

The additions were made on two grounds:
(i) Disallowance of purchases worth ₹2.16 crore from Dhanlaxmi Metal Industries on the pretext that the supplier had not replied to a Section 133(6) notice; and
(ii) An addition of ₹22.66 crore for unsecured loans from directors, calculated on a “peak balance” basis.

According to Surana, the taxpayer argued that both additions violated principles of natural justice. Evidence was produced showing that the supplier had indeed responded to the Section 133(6) notice with confirmations, invoices, e-way bills, transport details, and GST filings before the assessment was concluded. As for the unsecured loans, the taxpayer contended that no show-cause notice was issued, no computation basis was shared, and the AO relied on three fictitious judicial rulings.

Surana noted that the Bombay High Court identified major procedural flaws and a serious breach of fairness, including:
— The supplier’s confirmation was on record but ignored, while the assessment order falsely stated otherwise.
— The AO relied on three judicial citations that did not exist, showing lack of due verification despite AI use.
— No explanation or working for the “peak balance” addition was shared, denying the assessee a chance to respond.

Given these lapses, the Court ruled that the assessment order violated due process and quashed the assessment, demand, and penalty notices. It directed the AO to issue a detailed show-cause notice with clear reasoning, provide a personal hearing, and ensure that any cited judicial rulings are real and verified before being used.

Surana added that the High Court rightly exercised its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 since the case involved a complete breakdown of procedural justice, not just minor technical errors.

Mihir Tanna, Associate Director at S.K. Patodia LLP, highlighted that the ruling underscores two key principles — confirmation by third parties and the right to be heard. When a transaction’s authenticity is questioned, confirmations from the counterparty strengthen the taxpayer’s case. Likewise, denying an assessee a chance to present their explanation breaches natural justice.


How Did the Case Originate?

The matter originated when the taxpayer approached the Bombay High Court through a Writ Petition, contesting an Assessment Order issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated March 27, 2025, for Assessment Year 2023–24.

As per the challenged assessment, the Income Tax Department had increased the taxpayer’s total income to ₹27.91 crore, as opposed to ₹3.09 crore originally reported in his Income Tax Return (ITR). Alongside, the Notice of Demand issued under Section 156 was also disputed in the petition.

Upon examining the assessment order, the High Court observed that the tax officer had made two major income additions. The first was a disallowance of purchases worth ₹2.15 crore from a supplier company on the grounds that it had failed to respond to a Notice under Section 133(6). The second addition related to unsecured loans from directors, where a peak balance of ₹22.66 crore was added to the taxpayer’s income.

The Court remarked, “Even the opening balance was taken into account while making this addition, and to justify it, reliance was placed on certain judicial rulings.”


Bombay HC Rules Assessment Order Unjust: Natural Justice Overlooked

The Bombay High Court observed that after carefully examining the documents and hearing both sides, it became evident that the Assessment Order had been issued in clear violation of the principles of natural justice.

Regarding the first income addition, the Court noted that the tax authorities proceeded without considering the supplier’s reply to the Notice issued under Section 133(6). The taxpayer had attached, on page 568 of the petition, a copy of the notice dated March 4, 2025, addressed to the supplier, asking for detailed information to be furnished by March 5, 2025.

The Court further stated: “The concerned supplier submitted a detailed response on March 8, 2025, which can be found at page 571 of the petition. In that reply, the supplier not only confirmed the transaction but also submitted supporting evidence such as invoices, e-way bills, transport receipts, and GST returns. This response, along with the enclosures, spanned nearly 100 pages.”

The High Court emphasized that this reply was available well before the disputed assessment order was finalized.

The bench remarked: “It is clear that this crucial piece of evidence, though present on record, was ignored by the assessing officer. The order even stated that ‘no such reply was filed.’ In the department’s affidavit-in-reply, an apology has now been offered for the oversight.”


Bombay HC Warns Tax Department Against Blind Reliance on AI

The Bombay High Court, while examining the second issue regarding the addition of peak balances on loans from directors, observed that the tax officer had included the opening balance while computing the peak balance. To justify this, the officer relied upon three judicial decisions.

However, the Court pointed out that these cited rulings were entirely fictitious and had no existence. It questioned the tax department on how such references were obtained. The Court remarked: “In this age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), officials tend to depend heavily on the results produced by such systems. Yet, when performing quasi-judicial duties, one must not rely blindly on AI outputs. Each result should be properly verified before being used, or errors like this will occur.”

The Court further noted that the taxpayer had been left completely unaware of how the figures for the additions were determined. No workings, basis, or show-cause notice had been shared with the petitioner before finalizing the addition of peak balances.

The Bombay High Court concluded: “The taxpayer’s grievance in this regard is absolutely justified.”


Bombay High Court’s Final Verdict

The Bombay High Court concluded that, given the specific circumstances of this case, it would be inappropriate to direct the petitioner to pursue alternate legal remedies. The Court held that this was a suitable matter for exercising its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Accordingly, the Court set aside and annulled the Assessment Order issued under Section 143(3) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act dated March 27, 2025, for AY 2023–24. It also quashed the related Notice of Demand under Section 156 and the Show-Cause Notice for penalty under Section 274 read with Section 271AAC, both dated March 27, 2025.

The matter has been remanded to the Assessing Officer (AO) with clear directions to issue a fresh show-cause notice, explicitly mentioning the basis of any proposed additions or disallowances. The AO must provide the taxpayer with a fair opportunity to respond, adequate time to file a written reply, and a personal hearing before issuing the final assessment. If the department intends to rely on any judicial precedents, such references must be communicated to the petitioner at least seven days in advance. The fresh order should be a well-reasoned speaking order addressing every contention raised by the taxpayer and must be completed by December 31, 2025.

The Court further clarified that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the income additions or disallowances made earlier, and all rights and arguments of both parties remain preserved.

Finally, the writ petition was disposed of in these terms, with no order as to costs. The judgment will bear a digitally signed copy from the Private Secretary or Personal Assistant of the Court, and parties may act upon an authenticated digital version transmitted via email or fax.

GST Registration: Required Documents Guide

Introduction

Getting your business registered under GST is one of the first steps toward becoming a compliant and recognized enterprise in India. Whether you’re starting a new venture, expanding operations across states, or selling through e-commerce platforms, GST registration provides you with a unique identification number (GSTIN) to legally collect and remit taxes.

To make the process hassle-free, it’s important to know exactly which documents are required before you apply. Below is a complete list of documents you’ll need for GST registration based on your business type.


🔹 1. Basic Documents Required for All Applicants

Regardless of the business type, the following documents are mandatory for GST registration:

Document Type Purpose / Description
PAN Card Permanent Account Number of the applicant — individual, company, or firm.
Aadhaar Card Mandatory for Aadhaar authentication of the proprietor, partners, directors, or authorized signatory.
Photograph Passport-size photo of the proprietor, partner, director, or trustee.
Proof of Business Address Based on ownership type — ownership, rent, lease, or shared premises. Examples: Rent Agreement with NOC from owner, Electricity Bill, or Property Tax Receipt.
Digital Signature (DSC) Compulsory for Companies and LLPs for verification. Other entities may use EVC (OTP) for authentication.

🔹 2. Proof of Business Place

The document required for business address proof depends on the nature of property ownership:

Ownership Type Documents Required
🏠 Owned Property • Latest Property Tax Receipt, or
• Electricity Bill, or
• Municipal Khata Copy
🏢 Rented / Leased Property • Rent Agreement or Lease Deed (in business or applicant’s name), and
• Electricity Bill or Property Tax Receipt of the owner
🤝 Shared Premises • Consent Letter or No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the owner, and
• Supporting ownership proof (e.g., Electricity Bill or Property Tax Receipt)

🔹 3. Business Type-Wise Documents

Business Type Documents Required
🧑‍💼 (A) Proprietorship Firm • PAN and Aadhaar of proprietor
• Photograph of proprietor
• Proof of business address
👥 (B) Partnership Firm / LLP • Partnership Deed or LLP Agreement
• PAN of firm / LLP
• PAN & Aadhaar of all partners/designated partners
• Photographs of all partners
• Proof of business premises
• Authorisation Letter / Board Resolution appointing authorised signatory
🏢 (C) Private Limited / Public Limited Company • Certificate of Incorporation (CIN) issued by MCA
• Memorandum (MOA) & Articles of Association (AOA)
• PAN of company
• PAN & Aadhaar of all directors
• Board Resolution authorising a director as authorised signatory
• Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) of authorised signatory
• Proof of principal place of business
🙏 (D) Trust / Society / NGO • Registration certificate of trust/society
• PAN of entity
• PAN & Aadhaar of trustees/office bearers
• Proof of business address
• Authorisation letter for authorised signatory

🔹 4. Additional Documents (If Applicable)

Situation Additional Documents Required
🏭 SEZ Unit / Developer SEZ Letter of Approval issued by Government of India
🧾 Casual Taxable Person Valid ID proof, details of business, and estimated turnover
🌍 Non-resident Taxable Person Passport and proof of business in India
🛒 E-commerce Seller Agreement with e-commerce operator (if applicable)

🔹 5. Aadhaar Authentication (Mandatory Since 2020)

  • Aadhaar authentication is mandatory for all individuals such as proprietors, partners, or directors.

  • It enables fast-track approval within 3 working days under the simplified registration process (Rule 8 & 9).

  • Failure to authenticate Aadhaar may lead to physical verification of business premises by the department.


🔹 6. Document Upload Guidelines

📂 Accepted Formats: Upload files only in PDF or JPEG format. Each file should not exceed 1 MB.
🧾 Clarity Matters: Make sure all scanned copies are readable and details are visible without blur or shadow.
🪪 Name Consistency: The name on your uploaded documents must match exactly with the name on your PAN and Aadhaar records.
💡 Utility Proof Validity: Upload a recent utility bill (issued within the last 2 months) for address verification.
🏷️ Business Name Accuracy: Ensure your trade name or business name matches your PAN registration. If different, specify clearly in the application.
🔐 Digital Verification: Use the Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) or EVC OTP carefully during submission to avoid rejection.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMS to Auto-Populate Import Details in GSTR-2B Starting November 2025

The Invoice Management System (IMS) — a key technological reform under GST — was launched on the GST portal starting with the October 2024 tax period.

It enables taxpayers to view, monitor, and act on invoices uploaded by their suppliers through GSTR-1 / 1A / IFF, promoting greater transparency and facilitating accurate Input Tax Credit (ITC) reconciliation.

Building on this digital advancement, the GSTN has now expanded IMS to also capture “Import of Goods” details, providing taxpayers with a unified platform to manage both domestic and import transactions seamlessly.


🌍 New Addition: Import of Goods Integrated into IMS

The IMS Dashboard on the GST portal now features a dedicated section called “Import of Goods.”

This update links Bill of Entry (BoE) data — submitted by importers to Customs during goods import — directly with the IMS, allowing taxpayers to view, verify, and reconcile import details effortlessly within the same platform.

The enhancement will be effective from the October 2025 tax period, enabling smoother integration of Customs and GST data for improved compliance and accuracy.


🔍 Highlights of the Enhanced IMS Functionality

1️⃣ Auto-Fetch of Import Information
The GST portal will now automatically pull Bill of Entry (BoE) data directly from the ICEGATE Customs system, capturing all goods imported by the taxpayer.
This includes:

  • Imports originating from outside India, and

  • Supplies received from Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

2️⃣ New User Controls for Import Entries
Taxpayers can now review each BoE record and mark it as Accepted, Rejected, or Pending, similar to how supplier invoices are handled in IMS.
These actions will help ensure that Input Tax Credit (ITC) on IGST paid for imports is reflected accurately in their records.

3️⃣ Deemed Acceptance Mechanism
If a taxpayer doesn’t take any action on an import entry before the GSTR-2B generation date, it will automatically be treated as “deemed accepted.”
This avoids disruption in ITC flow due to oversight or delayed action.

4️⃣ Auto-Sync with GSTR-2B
Once actions are finalized, the GSTR-2B statement will be auto-generated on the 14th of the following month, following the regular timeline.
As a result, taxpayers will now get a consolidated view of both domestic and import-related transactions within a single GSTR-2B summary.


🧾 Example: Import Data Integration in Action

Consider TechNova Instruments Ltd., a Delhi-based company importing precision sensors from Germany in November 2025.

When the shipment lands, TechNova files a Bill of Entry (BoE) through the ICEGATE Customs system.
Within a short time, the same BoE details — including IGST paid, port of import, and invoice number — automatically appear in the company’s IMS dashboard under the “Import of Goods” tab on the GST portal.

TechNova can then:

  • Approve the entry if all information matches its internal purchase records.

  • Decline the entry if it belongs to another importer or contains discrepancies.

  • Mark Pending to verify the shipment details later.

If no action is taken before 14th December 2025, the system will auto-confirm the entry, ensuring the IGST credit appears in GSTR-2B for November 2025.


📈 Benefits of Import Data Integration in IMS

The inclusion of import data within the Invoice Management System (IMS) marks a major leap forward for taxpayers managing both domestic and international transactions.

Key Advantages:

  • 📊 Unified View: Access both domestic purchase invoices and import Bills of Entry (BoEs) from a single dashboard.

  • 🔍 Error-Free Matching: Eliminates discrepancies between GST and Customs data.

  • 💰 Accurate ITC Tracking: Ensures seamless reflection of IGST paid on imports in GSTR-2B.

  • ⚙️ Simplified Reconciliation: Minimizes manual effort, reducing human error and compliance delays.

  • 🌐 Enhanced Transparency: Strengthens cross-border compliance and promotes trust in tax data accuracy.


⚠️ Key Takeaways for Taxpayers

  • 🗓️ Effective Date: The new IMS import feature comes into force from the October 2025 tax period.

  • 📋 Regular Monitoring: Taxpayers should frequently review their IMS dashboard to verify newly fetched Bill of Entry (BoE) records.

  • 🚫 Deemed Acceptance Rule: If no action is taken on a BoE record before the GSTR-2B generation date, it will be auto-marked as accepted — so ensure any incorrect import entries are rejected in time.

  • 🧾 Unified GSTR-2B: From now on, GSTR-2B will automatically include import data along with domestic invoices, generated on the 14th of every month.

  • 🌐 SEZ Imports Included: This functionality also covers imports from Special Economic Zones (SEZs).


📆 Implementation Schedule

Particulars Implementation Month Key Action
IMS introduced on GST Portal October 2024 Supplier invoices made available for taxpayer action
Import of Goods section added October 2025 Bills of Entry (BoE) data integrated into IMS
Deemed Acceptance rule applies November 2025 onwards Unactioned BoE records automatically marked as accepted
Unified GSTR-2B generation From 14th November 2025 GSTR-2B will reflect both domestic and import transactions

📢 Essential Steps for Taxpayers

✅ Keep a close watch on your IMS dashboard each month for new import entries.
Verify every Bill of Entry (BoE) appearing in the system to ensure your import-related ITC is accurate.
Match import details with records available on the ICEGATE portal to confirm correctness.
✅ Take timely action — approve, dispute, or hold entries well before the 14th of the following month to avoid automatic acceptance.
✅ Treat the IMS as a single compliance hub for managing both domestic and import purchase data effectively.


🎯 Core Insight

From October 2025 onward, import transactions will seamlessly appear in the Invoice Management System (IMS) on the GST portal.
Each import record can be reviewed, confirmed, or flagged by the taxpayer, and the system will then auto-generate GSTR-2B on the 14th of the next month, combining both domestic and import information in a single, reconciled summary.

CBDT Notifies Revised Deadlines for Tax Audit and Income Tax Return Filing for AY 2025–26 (FY 2024–25)

🔔 Important Update
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has announced an extension of the filing deadlines for Tax Audit Reports and Income Tax Returns (ITR) for Assessment Year 2025–26, offering significant relief to taxpayers and professionals alike.

This extension follows multiple representations from professional associations and directives from various High Courts, acknowledging the difficulties caused by portal glitches, increased compliance workload, and concurrent statutory deadlines during the festive period.


📄 Revised Compliance Deadlines — At a Glance

Compliance Previous Due Date New Extended Date Applicable To
Tax Audit Report (Form 3CA/3CB & 3CD) 31st October 2025 10th November 2025 Taxpayers whose accounts are subject to audit under the Income-tax Act
Income Tax Return (ITR) — Audit Cases 31st October 2025 10th December 2025 Assessees covered under clause (a) of Explanation 2 to Section 139(1)
Transfer Pricing Audit / Report (Form 3CEB u/s 92E) No Change No Extension Granted Assessees engaged in international or specified domestic transactions

🧾 Official Announcement — CBDT Press Release Highlights

According to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT):

“The due date for filing the Return of Income under Section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2025–26 — earlier fixed as 31st October 2025 for assessees specified under clause (a) of Explanation 2 — has been extended to 10th December 2025.

Further, the ‘specified date’ for furnishing the Tax Audit Report for the Previous Year 2024–25 (AY 2025–26) has been extended to 10th November 2025.”

This move comes after several representations from professional bodies like ICAI and BCAS, and directions from various High Courts — including Gujarat, Punjab & Haryana, and Rajasthan — which emphasized the need for additional time due to technical issues, heavy filing loads, and overlapping compliance schedules.


🎯 Overview of the Extensions

Tax Audit Report (Form 3CD) — Deadline moved from 31st October to 10th November 2025
ITR Filing for Audit Cases — Due date extended from 31st October to 10th December 2025
No change in deadlines for Transfer Pricing (TP) reports or filings under Section 92E


💼 Who Can Avail the Extended Deadlines

The CBDT’s extension offers relief to:

  • Businesses and professionals covered under Section 44AB and liable for a tax audit.

  • Companies and partnership firms required to finalize and submit audited financial statements before ITR filing.

  • Audit and assurance assessees struggling with portal performance issues and heavy compliance workloads during the festive season.

⚠️ Note: Entities with Transfer Pricing (TP) audits under Form 3CEB will not benefit from this relaxation — their due date remains unchanged.


💡 Impact Overview

The revised timelines bring much-needed breathing space for both taxpayers and professionals:

  • 🗓️ 40 extra days granted for filing ITRs in audit cases and 10 more days for submitting audit reports.

  • 👨‍💼 Reduces last-minute rush and technical glitches for Chartered Accountants managing multiple statutory filings.

  • ✅ Promotes greater accuracy in reporting while minimizing exposure to penalties under Sections 234A, 234F, and 271B for delayed compliance.


⚠️ No Extension for Transfer Pricing (TP) Filings

The CBDT has confirmed that no relaxation applies to Transfer Pricing (TP) Reports filed in Form 3CEB.
These must continue to be submitted by the original deadline — 31st October 2025.

📌 Important Reminder:
Taxpayers involved in international or specified domestic transactions should complete their Form 3CEB filing on time to avoid penalties under Section 271BA, which may be levied for delayed submission.


🧮 Consequences of Missing the Revised Tax Deadlines

Nature of Default Applicable Section Levy / Fine
Late submission of Tax Audit Report Sec. 271B Penalty up to ₹1.5 lakh or 0.5% of turnover, whichever is lower
Delay in filing Income Tax Return (ITR) Sec. 234F ₹5,000, reduced to ₹1,000 if total income does not exceed ₹5 lakh
Failure to submit Transfer Pricing Report (Form 3CEB) Sec. 271BA Fixed penalty of ₹1,00,000

 

📰 8th Pay Commission Expected to Take Effect from January 1 — But Will It Boost Your Salary?

A major development has brought cheer to around 50 lakh central government employees and 69 lakh pensioners — the Central Government has approved the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the 8th Central Pay Commission (CPC), officially setting in motion the next major pay and pension revision.

The commission, headed by former Supreme Court judge Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, is tasked with submitting its report within 18 months, and its recommendations are likely to be implemented from January 1, 2026.

Announcing the move, Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw said, “The exact date of implementation will be finalized after receiving the interim report, but it is most likely to be January 1, 2026.”

The announcement — just ahead of the Bihar assembly elections on November 6 and 11 — has drawn significant attention, given its direct impact on millions of government employees and pensioners nationwide.


📘 What Are the Terms of Reference (ToR)?

The Terms of Reference (ToR) act as the guidelines or framework that define the commission’s duties, scope, and deadlines. They specify what the panel will study, which data it should evaluate, and by when it must submit its findings.

For the 8th CPC, the ToR have been finalized after detailed consultations with multiple stakeholders — including ministries, state governments, and staff associations.


🔍 Key Focus Areas of the 8th Pay Commission

As per reports, the 8th CPC will examine several factors to ensure a fair and sustainable pay structure. The main focus points include:

  • Assessing the current economic situation and maintaining fiscal prudence.

  • Ensuring enough resources remain available for development and welfare programs.

  • Reviewing the cost implications of pension schemes.

  • Evaluating how the pay revisions might affect state government finances, since many states adopt the Centre’s recommendations.

  • Comparing the pay, perks, and working conditions of central employees with those in public sector undertakings and private companies.

The commission’s primary goal is to balance fair compensation for employees with the government’s financial sustainability.


👥 Who’s on the 8th Pay Commission Panel?

The commission is chaired by Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai, with IIM Bangalore professor Pulak Ghosh as part-time member and Petroleum Secretary Pankaj Jain serving as member secretary.

Justice Desai, who also heads the Press Council of India, has led several national panels — including the Delimitation Commission for Jammu & Kashmir and the Uttarakhand Uniform Civil Code (UCC) committee.


🗓️ Timeline and What to Expect

If the process follows the usual pattern, the revised pay scales will be applicable from January 1, 2026, after the final recommendations are approved — continuing the decade-long cycle seen since the First Pay Commission.

For context, the 7th Pay Commission was constituted in 2014 and came into effect from January 1, 2016.

Until the new structure is implemented, employees will continue to receive Dearness Allowance (DA) revisions twice a year to help offset inflation.


💰 What It Means for Employees and Pensioners

The 8th Pay Commission is expected to bring:

  • Higher basic salaries and revised allowances

  • Increased pensions for retirees

  • Upgraded benefits and revised pay structures

It will likely influence state government pay revisions as well, since most states typically align their pay scales with the Centre’s.

While the exact salary increase will only be known once the report is submitted, the approval of the ToR confirms that the long-awaited process for the next pay revision cycle has officially begun.

🚨 GSTN Update: Extension Granted for Filing Overdue GST Returns

🆕 Late Filing Restrictions to Take Effect from November 2025
📅 Announcement Date: 29th October 2025
📢 Issued By: Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN)


🧾 Overview

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has released a crucial advisory urging taxpayers to submit all outstanding GST returns before the three-year deadline from their respective due dates lapses.

This move aligns with the enforcement of Sections 37, 39, 44, and 52 of the CGST Act, amended through the Finance Act, 2023 (Act No. 8 of 2023) and made effective from 1st October 2023 via Notification No. 28/2023 – Central Tax (dated 31st July 2023).

Under this reform, returns older than three years from their statutory due date cannot be filed, marking a significant step toward clearing long-pending defaults and improving data integrity within the GST system.


What’s Changing Under the New Rule

Previously, taxpayers could file overdue GST returns for any past period — even years later — by paying the applicable late fees and interest.

Under the revised framework, however, the GST portal will automatically restrict filing of any return once three years have passed since its original due date.

To ensure a smooth transition, the effective rollout of this restriction has been deferred until the November 2025 tax period.

👉 In practical terms, this means that any GST return older than three years as of November 2025 will be permanently locked from being filed on the portal.


📢 Key Points from GSTN Advisory (29th October 2025)

Under the Finance Act, 2023, taxpayers will no longer be able to file GST returns after three years from their respective due dates. This rule applies to the following sections:

  • Section 37 – Outward Supplies (Forms GSTR-1 / IFF)

  • Section 39 – Tax Payment Returns (Forms GSTR-3B, GSTR-4, GSTR-5, etc.)

  • Section 44 – Annual Returns (Forms GSTR-9, GSTR-9C)

  • Section 52 – Tax Collected at Source (Form GSTR-8)

These provisions collectively cover major return types — GSTR-1, 3B, 4, 5, 5A, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 9C.

The three-year filing restriction will officially take effect from the November 2025 tax period, meaning any return whose original due date is before 30th November 2022 will be permanently locked from filing after 30th November 2025.

📅 Notably, a similar advisory was released in October 2024, but the implementation deadline has now been extended to December 2025 to give taxpayers additional time to regularize past defaults.


📊 Illustration of Returns That Will Be Restricted from Filing Effective 1st December 2025

GST Form Period Affected Description
GSTR-1 / IFF October 2022 Outward supply details for monthly filers
GSTR-1 (Quarterly) July – September 2022 For taxpayers under QRMP scheme
GSTR-3B (Monthly) October 2022 Monthly return summarizing tax payment
GSTR-3B (Quarterly) July – September 2022 For small taxpayers under QRMP scheme
GSTR-4 FY 2021-22 Annual return for composition taxpayers
GSTR-5 October 2022 Return for non-resident taxable persons
GSTR-6 October 2022 Filed by Input Service Distributors (ISD)
GSTR-7 October 2022 Return for TDS deductors
GSTR-8 October 2022 Return for TCS collectors (E-commerce operators)
GSTR-9 / 9C FY 2020-21 Annual return and reconciliation statement

➡️ Note: All the above returns will be permanently blocked from filing after 30th November 2025, as they exceed the three-year filing window allowed under the amended GST law.


📌 Understanding the Change

Starting 1st December 2025, any taxpayer who has not filed returns for periods older than the timelines mentioned will find the filing option automatically disabled on the GST portal.

In simpler terms:
👉 Returns due before October 2022 (for monthly filers) or before Q2 FY 2022–23 (for quarterly filers) will be permanently unavailable for submission after the cut-off date.



💡 Purpose Behind the Restriction

The introduction of this rule is intended to:

  • Eliminate long-pending non-filers and streamline inactive GST registrations.

  • Enhance the reliability and consistency of GST data and ITC reconciliation.

  • Discourage delayed or backdated filings that distort the accuracy of tax records.

  • Promote a culture of timely compliance and ensure closure of past liabilities.


⚠️ Practical Impact on Taxpayers

Taxpayers who still have unfiled GST returns for FY 2020-21, 2021-22, or 2022-23 should complete their filings without delay.

Once the restriction becomes active, these returns cannot be filed at all, even by paying penalties or late fees.

Non-compliance may lead to:

  • Input Tax Credit (ITC) mismatches for recipients

  • Issuance of demand or show-cause notices by the department

  • Possible suspension or cancellation of GST registration


🧮 Illustrative Example

Suppose your GSTR-3B for October 2022 had a due date of 20th November 2022.
Once the three-year period ends — i.e., on 20th November 2025 — the system will automatically restrict access to file this return.
After that, you won’t be able to submit it, even if you intend to comply voluntarily or pay applicable dues.


📢 Recommended Actions for Taxpayers

Check & Reconcile all pending GST returns for FY 2021-22 and FY 2022-23.
Submit any unfiled returns (GSTR-1, 3B, 4, 7, 8, 9/9C, etc.) well before 30th November 2025 to avoid permanent blocking.
Alert clients, accountants, and teams to finalize and upload pending data without delay.
Verify ITC claims, tax payments, and interest to ensure accurate compliance before filing.

Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements: ICAI Releases Detailed FAQs and Guidance

The ICAI has rolled out a new compilation of FAQs aimed at providing greater clarity on the Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements option while generating a UDIN (Unique Document Identification Number).

This latest guidance comes at a crucial time, as it directly affects the submission of Tax Audit and Audit & Assurance reports during one of the busiest periods for professionals.

Here’s a detailed breakdown of the clarifications issued and their practical significance for members handling audit assignments.


🟩 Q1. Do auditors need to compulsorily mention their opinion on financial statements while generating UDIN?

✅ Answer:
Yes, entering the Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements is mandatory only in the following two categories:

  • GST and Tax Audit engagements, and

  • Audit & Assurance assignments

For other professional services — such as Internal Audits, Concurrent Audits, or Valuation Work — mentioning the auditor’s opinion is not required and the field can be left blank.


🟩 Q2. What information needs to be filled under the “Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements” section?

✅ Answer:
While generating a UDIN, members will see the prompt:

“Is Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements applicable to this audit?”

Your next steps will depend on how you respond:


If you select “Yes”:

You’ll be required to provide the following details:

  1. Type of Opinion – choose the appropriate option from the dropdown:

    • Unmodified Opinion

    • Qualified Opinion

    • Adverse Opinion

    • Disclaimer of Opinion

  2. Additional Reporting Elements – specify “Yes” or “No” for:

    • Key Audit Matters (KAM)

    • Emphasis of Matter (EOM)

    • Other Matter

    • Material Uncertainty related to Going Concern

  3. Entity Type – select whether the entity is:

    • Listed, or

    • Unlisted (and if unlisted, choose the relevant sub-category such as Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Private Limited Company, etc., or select “Others”).


If you select “No”:

No further inputs are necessary, and you can proceed to the next step in the UDIN generation process.


🟩 Q3. What does the term “Modified Opinion” mean?

✅ Answer:
According to SA 705 (Revised)Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditor’s Report, a modified opinion is issued when the auditor concludes that the financial statements do not present a true and fair view, either due to identified misstatements or insufficient audit evidence.

Modified opinions are categorized into three types:

  • Qualified Opinion

  • Adverse Opinion

  • Disclaimer of Opinion

These variations depend on the nature and extent (pervasiveness) of the issue identified during the audit.


📘 Reference Summary – SA 705 (Revised):

Nature of Matter Leading to Modification Auditor’s Judgment on Impact Resulting Type of Opinion
Financial statements contain material misstatements Material but not pervasive Qualified Opinion
Financial statements contain material misstatements Material and pervasive Adverse Opinion
Unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence Material but not pervasive Qualified Opinion
Unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence Material and pervasive Disclaimer of Opinion

🟩 Q4. When should an auditor select “No” for the field — “Is Auditor’s Opinion applicable to this audit?”

✅ Answer:
The “No” option should be chosen only when the engagement does not require the auditor to express a true and fair view on the financial statements. In such cases, the assignment does not involve forming or reporting an auditor’s opinion.

As per SA 700 (Revised)Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements, an auditor’s opinion is required only when the financial statements are prepared to present a true and fair view. Therefore, for other types of engagements — such as certifications, reviews, or procedures not involving opinion reporting — selecting “No” is appropriate.


🟩 Q5. Does an auditor need to provide an opinion for engagements such as concurrent audit, stock audit, revenue audit, internal audit, valuation, system audit, or compilation under SRS 4410?

✅ Answer:
No.
These types of assignments do not require the expression of an auditor’s opinion on financial statements. They are not considered assurance engagements under SA 700 (Revised) and therefore fall outside the scope of this UDIN functionality.


🟩 Q6. Is it necessary to report the Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements for a Tax Audit conducted under Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

✅ Answer:
Yes. For audits carried out under Section 44AB, the auditor is required to express an opinion on the financial statements in certain cases.

  • Under Clause 3(b) of Form 3CB, the auditor must state their opinion on the financial statements. Accordingly, this information needs to be entered while generating a UDIN.

On the other hand,

  • Under Clause 3 of Form 3CA and Clause 5 of Form 3CB, the auditor provides an opinion only on the particulars reported in Form 3CD, not on the financial statements themselves.
    Therefore, these clauses do not call for separate reporting under the new UDIN “Auditor’s Opinion” field

🟩 Q7. Is an Auditor’s Opinion mandatory for audits conducted under the Maharashtra Charitable Trust Act?

✅ Answer:
Yes.
Audits performed under the Maharashtra Charitable Trust Act require the auditor to express an opinion on the trust’s financial statements. Consequently, the auditor must enter this information while generating the UDIN for such assignments.


🟩 Q8. What is the reporting approach when significant doubt exists about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern?

✅ Answer:
When there are indicators of material uncertainty concerning the entity’s going concern status, the auditor must follow the guidance outlined in SA 570 (Revised)Going Concern, along with the technical advisories issued by ICAI.

The auditor should carefully review management’s assessment of the entity’s financial viability and, if such uncertainty persists, make an appropriate reference in the Auditor’s Report under the section “Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern.”


🟩 Q9. Does any change or qualification in audit trail reporting need to be reflected under the Auditor’s Opinion section in UDIN?

✅ Answer:
No.
According to Rule 11(g) of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, remarks or qualifications relating to the audit trail are disclosed under the section “Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements.”

Such observations relate specifically to system compliance and do not alter the core opinion expressed on the financial statements. Therefore, they are not required to be reported or modified under the Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements functionality in UDIN.


🟩 Q10. Should modifications in Internal Financial Controls (IFC) reporting be included under the Auditor’s Opinion section in UDIN?

✅ Answer:
No.
Under Section 143(3)(i) of the Companies Act, 2013, auditors are required to express a separate opinion on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of Internal Financial Controls over Financial Reporting (IFCFR).

If control weaknesses or deficiencies are identified, the auditor may modify their IFC report; however, this modification does not affect the overall opinion on the financial statements unless those deficiencies have a material impact on true and fair presentation.

Hence, such IFC-related remarks do not need to be reflected in the Auditor’s Opinion on Financial Statements section while generating UDIN.


🧩 Key Practical Insights for Members

  • Applicable Scope: The Auditor’s Opinion field is mandatory only for GST & Tax Audits and Assurance assignments.

  • When to Choose “No”: Opt for “No” only in cases where no true and fair view opinion is required.

  • Tax Audit Clarification: For Form 3CB, the opinion on financial statements is mandatory; Form 3CA cases are exempt.

  • Non-Assurance Engagements: Internal, stock, concurrent, or revenue audits don’t require opinion disclosure under this field.

  • Going Concern Matters: Any uncertainty must be handled strictly as per SA 570 (Revised).

  • Other Reporting Areas: Changes in audit trail or Internal Financial Controls (IFC) reporting are not part of this UDIN functionality.


📘 Key Insights

The enhanced UDIN functionality is designed to align auditor reporting more closely with the Standards on Auditing (SAs) and strengthen the traceability of opinions through the UDIN system.

As these changes coincide with the Tax Audit filing season, members should quickly acquaint themselves with the updated requirements to ensure accurate and compliant UDIN generation.

Important Tax & Compliance Amendments from 1st November 2025 – GST, Income Tax, PAN, and Aadhaar

(Applicable to GST, Income Tax, PAN–Aadhaar, and Banking Compliance)

Starting 1st November 2025, several important regulatory and procedural updates will take effect across GST, Income Tax, Aadhaar–PAN, and Banking regulations.
These changes are designed to streamline compliance, enhance digital verification, and promote greater transparency within the tax and financial ecosystem.

Let’s take a closer look at the major updates coming into force from this date.


🧾 GST Overhaul: Important Changes Taking Effect from 1st November 2025

1️⃣ New Simplified GST Registration for Small & Low-Risk Businesses

A new simplified GST registration framework will roll out on 1st November 2025, aimed at easing the compliance burden and speeding up the onboarding process for small and low-risk taxpayers.

What’s New:

  • Instant approval: Applications from low-risk businesses will be automatically processed within three working days.

  • Who can apply: Businesses whose output tax on B2B supplies is below ₹2.5 lakh per month (inclusive of all GST components) can register under this scheme.

  • Flexible participation: Taxpayers can join or exit the scheme anytime without restrictions.

  • Around 96% of new GST applicants are expected to qualify for this faster, paperless process.

Why It Matters:
The move is set to reduce bureaucracy and manual checks, enabling startups, freelancers, and small enterprises to get GST registration swiftly and focus more on business growth than compliance delays.


2️⃣ Smart Refund System for Zero-Rated Supplies (Based on Risk Profiling)

Starting 1st November 2025, exporters and SEZ suppliers can look forward to faster GST refunds under a newly introduced risk-based provisional refund mechanism. The move is aimed at improving liquidity and reducing refund delays while keeping a close eye on compliance risks.

Here’s How It Works:

  • Under the revised Rule 91(2) of the CGST Rules, up to 90% of the refund amount will be released provisionally after a system-driven risk check.

  • Refunds will only be held back in exceptional cases where a deeper review is needed.

  • The government may notify certain high-risk categories that won’t qualify for this automatic process.

Why It Matters:
This update promises a smoother refund experience for exporters and SEZ units — helping them maintain better cash flow and focus on business operations, while the system continues to ensure data-backed risk monitoring.


3️⃣ Faster Refunds for Inverted Duty Structure (IDS) Cases

To provide relief to manufacturers and traders struggling with input tax credit accumulation, the government is introducing provisional refunds for cases under the Inverted Duty Structure (IDS) — a long-awaited reform effective from 1st November 2025.

What’s Changing:

  • The CBIC will soon issue instructions allowing 90% of eligible refunds to be released provisionally, based on a risk assessment framework.

  • This new process will operate similarly to the zero-rated refund mechanism, ensuring faster processing and reduced delays.

  • A formal amendment to the CGST Act is expected to follow, solidifying the provision.

Why It Matters:
This change will bring much-needed cash flow support to manufacturers and sectors where input taxes outweigh output liability, helping them manage liquidity better and ease working capital pressure


4️⃣ Three-Year Deadline Introduced for Filing Pending GST Returns

Beginning 1st November 2025, taxpayers will face a strict three-year time limit for filing any pending GST returns. This change, introduced through the Finance Act, 2023 and implemented via Notification No. 28/2023, aims to bring more discipline and finality to GST compliance.

What’s Changing:
After three years from the original due date, taxpayers will no longer be able to file or revise the following GST returns on the portal:

  • GSTR-1, IFF – Outward supplies

  • GSTR-3B – Summary return

  • GSTR-4 – For composition taxpayers

  • GSTR-5 / 5A – For non-residents and OIDAR services

  • GSTR-6 – Input Service Distributors

  • GSTR-7 / 8 – TDS/TCS returns

  • GSTR-9 & 9C – Annual return and reconciliation statement

Example:
If a return for September 2022 (or any earlier period) is still unfiled, it cannot be submitted after 1st November 2025.

Why It Matters:
Businesses with old or pending filings should immediately reconcile records and complete submissions before the deadline. Missing this window could result in permanent blocking of return filing and potential non-compliance issues.


5️⃣ New “Pending” Option for Credit Notes in the GST Invoice Management System (IMS)

To make GST reconciliation smoother and minimize supplier–recipient disputes, a new “Pending” status has been added to the Invoice Management System (IMS) on the GST portal.

What’s New:

  • Taxpayers can now mark Credit Notes as “Pending” for a specific tax period, giving them more flexibility in managing input tax credit (ITC) reversals.

  • Once the credit note is accepted, taxpayers can update or revise the ITC reversal accordingly.

  • This update is designed to reduce timing mismatches and disagreements between buyers and suppliers during return filing.

Why It Matters:
The new option gives businesses greater control and transparency over how credit notes and ITC adjustments are handled — resulting in fewer reconciliation errors and smoother compliance management.


6️⃣ Annual GST Return (GSTR-9 & 9C) Enabled for FY 2024–25

The GST portal has now activated GSTR-9 and GSTR-9C filing for the financial year 2024–25. Taxpayers can begin preparing their annual returns and reconciliation statements for submission.

Key Details:

  • Forms Enabled: GSTR-9 (Annual Return) and GSTR-9C (Reconciliation Statement)

  • Due Date: 30th November 2025 — also the final date to claim Input Tax Credit (ITC) for FY 2024–25.

Why It Matters:
Businesses should start reconciling purchase data, invoices, and ITC records early to ensure accurate filing. Submitting before the deadline helps avoid ITC loss and ensures error-free compliance for the year.


💼 Key Income Tax & Corporate Compliance Deadlines Ahead

Although no fresh Income Tax amendments take effect from 1st November 2025, this period continues to be a crucial compliance window for taxpayers, businesses, and corporate entities. Multiple statutory filings and reporting obligations converge during the last quarter of the calendar year.

Important Upcoming Deadlines:

  • 📅 31st October 2025
    • Submission of Tax Audit Reports (Form 3CA/3CB–3CD)
    Income Tax Returns for companies and audited taxpayers (including partners of audited firms)
    TDS Returns for Quarter 2 (July–September 2025)
    Director KYC through DIR-3 KYC / DIR-3 KYC-WEB

  • 📆 30th November 2025 – Filing of Transfer Pricing Report (Form 3CEB)

  • 💸 15th December 2025 – Payment of the third instalment of Advance Tax

  • 🧾 31st December 2025MCA Annual Filings – AOC-4 and MGT-7/7A for submission of financial statements and annual returns

Takeaway:
As this period overlaps with GST rule changes and digital compliance reforms, businesses should coordinate tax audits, TDS submissions, and ROC filings in advance. Maintaining consistency across Income Tax, GST, and MCA disclosures helps avoid mismatches, penalties, and last-minute stress.


🪪 Updates on Aadhaar, PAN, and KYC Compliance

As regulatory bodies move toward stronger digital identity verification, several new updates related to Aadhaar, PAN, and KYC procedures will shape compliance practices in the coming months.

📘 Aadhaar Policy Changes

The UIDAI has introduced a refreshed policy for updating Aadhaar information to maintain the accuracy of demographic and biometric data:

  • Individuals are now advised to review and update their Aadhaar details every 10 years to ensure their information stays current.

  • Both biometric and demographic corrections can be made periodically through authorized service centers.

  • Children’s Aadhaar records can be updated free of charge when they reach the ages of 5 and 15.

🧾 PAN–Aadhaar Integration

  • The deadline to link PAN with Aadhaar has been set for 31st December 2025.

  • Any PAN left unlinked after the cut-off will be temporarily deactivated, restricting access to ITR filing, banking, and investment transactions until the linkage is completed.

💳 KYC Framework Enhancements

  • Financial institutions have been directed to implement live Aadhaar-based KYC authentication for faster and more secure identity validation.

  • High-value accounts will undergo stricter and more frequent verification cycles to help detect and prevent financial irregularities.

In Short:
Keeping your Aadhaar, PAN, and KYC records up to date is now more critical than ever — delays or mismatches can disrupt essential banking and tax-related activities.


🏦 Upcoming Banking Regulation Updates – Effective Around November 2025

The banking sector is set to roll out a series of compliance and verification updates aimed at improving transparency, reducing fraud, and strengthening digital security.

💰 Stricter Monitoring of High-Value Transactions

Banks will now conduct enhanced checks on large cash and digital transactions, ensuring that every high-value payment or deposit is verified through Aadhaar and PAN.

🧾 Mandatory KYC Re-Verification for Dormant Accounts

Accounts that have remained inactive for over two years will soon require fresh KYC verification before reactivation. This move is intended to prevent misuse of dormant accounts and ensure updated customer records.

⚙️ Digital, Consent-Based Onboarding

A new framework for paperless, consent-driven account opening will be introduced to simplify customer onboarding while maintaining robust data security and compliance with privacy norms.

💳 Revised Credit Card and UPI Linking Rules

Banks and payment platforms will be required to validate PAN details for all credit card and UPI-linked accounts, tightening identity verification and reducing the risk of fraudulent transactions.

Takeaway:
These measures reflect a broader push toward secure, transparent, and digitally integrated banking, aligning financial systems with India’s evolving regulatory and compliance ecosystem.